> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible > Sent: Friday, 26 September 2003 2:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: graphviz (and doxygen?) > > Hi Gareth, > > Gareth Pearce wrote on Thursday, September 25, 2003 6:18 PM: > > Somewhat amusing little bug - the code correctly supports > > textmode - if the #define had of been in the file with the > > #ifdef that dependend on it... > > > > It appears I have a nice working version, works on > > text/binary mounts - 'dot' is working with both now too. (I > > think it was being fed corrupt data > > before) > > > > So shall I package it up? > > sounds great. Personally I would split it up into two separat packages > (graphviz and doxygen), because Graphviz may be used by other packages or > applications too and it is only optional to doxygen. Since they are used > quite often together you may put a dependency for graphviz into the > doxygen setup.hint file.
Well I was never intending to put them in one - separate original source tar.gz's files - so putting them together would be crazy. I am thinking of putting doxygen documentation in a separate package. I don’t think a dependency is a good idea - if we had suggests - I would, but until then I'd just leave them separate. Might mention it in any announcements about said packages. Anyway... Was that a vote for graphviz? Regards, Gareth
