Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Jerome BENOIT no longer has the time to maintain the tetex-beta package.
>>
>>Any volunteers?
>>
>
>Guess I must move quick now, before someone else snatches this most
>wanted package.
>
>
>
>But seriously, I managed to build teTeX-src-beta-20020530 today. It's
>still a bit of work before I get this packaged (my mknetrel way), but,
>there it is. IOW, I'm assuming there's not too much hurry to
>provide a new release.
>
>Any suggestions for renaming the tetex packages? What if we'd do
>
> @tetex-beta
>
^^^^^^^^^^
I assume this is supposed to be @tetex-base?
>
> version: <new version>
> requires: tetex-bin
>
> @texmf-base
> version: <new version>
> requires: tetex-base
>
>etc?
>
Sounds good to me [though you might considier using the proper naming
i.e. teTeX-bin TeXmf-base ] but I'll let others comment on how to make
this transition smooth.
>
>
>>Many thanks to Jerome for his efforts over the last 1+ years.
>>
>
>Yes, a big thanks Jerome.
>
Three Cheers for Jerome!
Can we have Xdvi (included in tetex) now that X11 is part of Cygwin? In
fact, you might want to partition the X11 parts into 'teTeX-X11-bin'.
Thanks for offering to take over Jan, perhaps you will then want to add
lillypond to the official distribution, that way you'd no longer be
required to maintain a fork distro...
Cheers,
Nicholas
