On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 02:00:06PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: >Chris January wrote: >>>I suspect that this must have something to do with binutils. I changed >>>the alignments at David Billinghurst's suggestion to accommodate java. >>>If this is causing problems, however, I'll change them back. >>> >>That's what I was referring to. >> >Is it possible for you to work around this? I believe the alignment >change is necessary for a working libgcj/gcj suite. It would be nice >to have both working properly...
Yes, I agree. On thinking about this, it seems like the header files are probably in error if they are sensitive to this. For the record. I changed this: #define COFF_DEFAULT_SECTION_ALIGNMENT_POWER (2) to this: #define COFF_DEFAULT_SECTION_ALIGNMENT_POWER (4) but I confess that I didn't give much thought to what it did. I thought it just changed the alignment of sections rather than the alignment within sections. Now that I think of it, the way I did things would change this only for native compilers, not cross compilers. That's not right. Maybe this explains the gcc errors that I've been seeing. cgf
