Rob, On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 10:46:25PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > Where are we at with the rebase stuff BTW?
I actually have made some progress recently to two fronts. I have begun to migrate my setup-rebase code to use STL. So, far I have converted free_list to use set instead of my homegrown stuff. The code compiles but I had to leave it (again) before testing. Once I test it, the used_list conversion should go quicker. After the conversion to STL, I will begin to implement the items derived from your feedback. I have also updated my completely stand-alone rebase (*) to copy the image file before attempting to rebase and to skip it if corruption is detected. I hope to release this version RSN. Ultimately, I will migrate this functionality into setup.exe's rebase functionality. Jason (*) This rebase version is very similar to MS's and does *not* persist rebase runs to be used by future ones. This version should not be confused with the one that I use to test setup.exe's rebase functionality and possibly will become a Cygwin package to augment this functionality.
