Nicholas Wourms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>Jerome BENOIT no longer has the time to maintain the tetex-beta package. >> >>Any volunteers? >> >>Many thanks to Jerome for his efforts over the last 1+ years. >> > Since Jan Nieuwenhuizen already is already maintaining the cygwin > teTeX-texmf TDS tree and lillypod depends on teTeX-bin to operate, it > would make sense (to me) for Jan to be the teTeX-bin maintainer. > There is no need to have 2 people maintaining parts of a whole > package. Of course, whether or not Jan wants to do this is another > story... What do you say Jan?
It makes some kind of sense. But I already made another vague promise (netpbm) that I haven't kept until now. This moring after reading Christopher's mail, I downloaded tetex-beta and latest sources to see if I could painlessly take over. I spent a good hour poking around, but I found that: * tetex isn't prepared for --srcdir builds (annoying) * tetex isn't prepared for cross builds (showstopper) * Jerome's Cygwin fixes have still not found their way upstream * Jerome's Cygwin patch isn't prepared for --srcdir builds So... I'll promise to take a look at it, because I really like to have a good tetex package in Cygwin. But, I can't promise to take it over yet, as I don't run Windows (and thus also no cygwin). If I can get the beast to cross build, and get it tested, I may step forward to be the maintainer. Greetings, Jan. Btw: I've been putting quite some time in getting a fine guile release to cross build for Cygwin, because this has a high priority for me. But as yet I can't get a shared version linked. It seems I need the latest autotools from cygwin, but I need them as cross build tools. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org