En Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:44:21 -0300, Arthur Barrett
<[email protected]> escribió:
Gabriel Genellina,
May I suggest using more "separate" version numbers?
For an outsider, 2.5.03 and 2.5.04 appear to be essentially the same
version, just with small bugs fixed. And a number like 2.6 means "new
features" not present in 2.5. At least that's what I would
expect without knowing the CVSNT history.
This should be in the FAQ - we've followed this pattern years now...
The version number is V.NN.XX.BBBB
V = major architecture changes
NN = significant architecture changes
XX = feature releases
BBBB = bug fixes
But that's not the format used in the banner:
cvs ver
Concurrent Versions System (CVSNT) 2.5.03 (Scorpio) Build 2382
(client/server)
Most people would say the version number is 2.5.03, not 2.5.03.2382
Eg:
1.11 to 2.0
major architecture changes, eg: ditching C for C++
2.x to 3.1
major architecture changes, eg: ditching RCS for Relational DB.
Thanks; btw, last time I searched, I could not find a changelog for CVSNT,
is it available somewhere?
--
Gabriel Genellina
_______________________________________________
cvsnt mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt
Upgrade to CVS Suite for more features and support: http://march-hare.com/cvsnt/
