On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:29:34 +0200, Andreas Krey <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:53:05 +0000, Tony Hoyle wrote: >> Andreas Krey wrote: >... >> If you need to be able to reconstruct the *exact* build environment for >> an old revision, to fix a bug for a customer, then having the dependent >> libraries in there and possibly even the compilers is a normal thing to >> do. > >Nowadays you should probably store the VMware image used for the >build and hope that the windows licencing doesn't fool you. > The VMWare dev image I am working in right now (well, not while typing this, but otherwiise) is clocking in at 40.2 Gb of data files including the vmdk:s. Not something you'd version control really... -- /Bo (Bo Berglund, developer in Sweden) _______________________________________________ cvsnt mailing list [email protected] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt Upgrade to CVS Suite for more features and support: http://march-hare.com/cvsnt/
