On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 09:19:07 +0100, Bo Berglund wrote: >There is one item I don't know about this that needs to be figured out >and this is how to use the tool to get old info into the Audit >database in a repository that has started using Audit along the way so >some parts are already stored and some are not.... >Clearly this must be handled so there are not afterwards double >entries for the same items.
For commits, that would be the commit id, I think. If it's already in the database, it's probably safe to assume that auditing was on at the time of the commit (or the tool has been run already). For tags and branches, it probably would be the tag/branch name. Gerhard _______________________________________________ cvsnt mailing list [email protected] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt Upgrade to CVS Suite for more features and support: http://march-hare.com/cvsnt/
