Done. I think we still want the email addresses but I've suggested ccing ghc-devs.
Incidentally when will ghc-devs go live? S | -----Original Message----- | From: cvs-ghc-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:cvs-ghc-boun...@haskell.org] | On Behalf Of Ian Lynagh | Sent: 14 December 2012 15:06 | To: cvs-ghc@haskell.org | Subject: Re: The end of an era, and the dawn of a new one | | On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:46:42PM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | > | > Please look! I have begun with a statement about what being an | "owner" means; please help refine it. | | Perhaps add something like: | | It does not mean that the owner can make decisions that the | community disagrees with. While being willing to roll your sleeves | up does lend weight to your voice, owners should aim to find | consensus for contentious issues. | | ? | | > General opinions? | | Generally looks good. | | I'm not sure if giving e-mail addresses for owners is a good idea. | Shouldn't messages still be sent to cvs-ghc@, so that other people can | weigh in if they have an opinion, or reply if the owner isn't around? | | | Thanks | Ian | -- | Ian Lynagh, Haskell Consultant | Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/ | | _______________________________________________ | Cvs-ghc mailing list | Cvs-ghc@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
