Done.  I think we still want the email addresses but I've suggested ccing 
ghc-devs.

Incidentally when will ghc-devs go live?

S

| -----Original Message-----
| From: cvs-ghc-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:cvs-ghc-boun...@haskell.org]
| On Behalf Of Ian Lynagh
| Sent: 14 December 2012 15:06
| To: cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: The end of an era, and the dawn of a new one
| 
| On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:46:42PM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| >
| > Please look!  I have begun with a statement about what being an
| "owner" means; please help refine it.
| 
| Perhaps add something like:
| 
|     It does not mean that the owner can make decisions that the
|     community disagrees with. While being willing to roll your sleeves
|     up does lend weight to your voice, owners should aim to find
|     consensus for contentious issues.
| 
| ?
| 
| > General opinions?
| 
| Generally looks good.
| 
| I'm not sure if giving e-mail addresses for owners is a good idea.
| Shouldn't messages still be sent to cvs-ghc@, so that other people can
| weigh in if they have an opinion, or reply if the owner isn't around?
| 
| 
| Thanks
| Ian
| --
| Ian Lynagh, Haskell Consultant
| Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/
| 
| _______________________________________________
| Cvs-ghc mailing list
| Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to