On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:41:11PM +1100, Ben Lippmeier wrote:
> 
> > For vector and random the same questions apply, but since we simply have 
> > lagging git repos for them we can create a ghc-7.6 branch.  Did you 
> > deliberately not do that, Ian?
> 
> I expect Ian didn't branch DPH because it's not his job to test it with the 
> GHC RC and ship it as part of the GHC source tarball. I can do the release 
> part, but if Ian branches DPH as well then it is effectively zero-overhead to 
> his existing workflow, and we won't hit this breakage again (I think?).

Right, I didn't branch them as we don't use them in the stable branch.
But I can make the branches for future stable branches if that's useful,
no problem.


Thanks
Ian


_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to