On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:41:11PM +1100, Ben Lippmeier wrote: > > > For vector and random the same questions apply, but since we simply have > > lagging git repos for them we can create a ghc-7.6 branch. Did you > > deliberately not do that, Ian? > > I expect Ian didn't branch DPH because it's not his job to test it with the > GHC RC and ship it as part of the GHC source tarball. I can do the release > part, but if Ian branches DPH as well then it is effectively zero-overhead to > his existing workflow, and we won't hit this breakage again (I think?).
Right, I didn't branch them as we don't use them in the stable branch. But I can make the branches for future stable branches if that's useful, no problem. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
