Ian Lynagh wrote: > If we're going to go this route, then I think we should do it by > comparing SIZEOF_VOID_P to SIZEOF_INT etc, rather than assuming that > either 'ld' or 'd' is right based on _LP64.
+1 Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc