Ian Lynagh wrote:

> If we're going to go this route, then I think we should do it by
> comparing SIZEOF_VOID_P to SIZEOF_INT etc, rather than assuming that
> either 'ld' or 'd' is right based on _LP64.

+1

Erik
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to