On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:05:24PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 02:09:28PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:58:13PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote:
> > >
> > > The library component of Haddock is still not build with GHC. Would it
> > > be sane to build/include the library component of Haddock with GHC, so
> > > that there is only one "build flavor" of Haddock?
> >
> > I suspect the current setup predates the ability for executables to
> > depend on libraries in the same Cabal package. I'd suggest that the
> > haddock executable should be changed to depend on the haddock library,
> > and as far as I can see there is no reason why that should cause
> > problems in the GHC build.
>
> Ok, I just changed that [1] (on branch ghc-7.6). Now the executable
> depends on the library. I'm validating it right now; if there are no
> issues I'll push it.
After making an other minor modification to the cabal file [1] it fails
with:
ghc-cabal: XXX ghc-cabal can't handle more than one buildinfo yet
Would this require modifications to ghc-cabal?
Cheers,
Simon
[1]
https://github.com/sol/haddock/commit/c590122994bfc9c852fbed470c93b0e4cb633cf9
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
