Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm hoping that once GHC's view of base is saner (and in particular,
> most modules are not in a recursive import loop) we can look at making
> ghc, nhc, hugs, etc, have a more consistent view, with imports and
> code mostly shared. Then it should be a lot less likely that a change
> will cause impl-specific breakage.
Yes, it's a good goal, and I'm very much looking forward to it.
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
