Claus Reinke wrote:
You might want to try darcs 2.0.2 on Windows. Nowadays I try darcs 2 first on Windows, then if that fails I fall back to darcs 1 (but I don't think I've encountered a case where darcs 2.0.2 failed and darcs 1 worked yet).

Cheers,
Simon

Thanks! I'd been wondering whether the time was ripe to switch
yet (there seemed to be a fairly high volume of reports for darcs 2
on the darcs lists; but then there are lots of unfixed issues in darcs 1).

If I understand the darcs tickets, some of the issues are still lurking in darcs 2, too;-) but at least, they are likely to get fixed there. Are performance and incomplete Windows releases no longer an issue, or should one still augment the official release
with your personal setup?

Performance is still an issue, but reliability is more important (of course), and darcs2 appears more reliable than darcs1, especially on Windows. Also it has useful progress reporting, and dozens of minor improvements.

I'm not sure what you're referring to with respect to incomplete Windows releases, but as I mentioned before I've uploaded my darcs2 Windows binary and linked it from the darcs download page, along with instructions for how to get it working with Cygwin/MSYS ssh.

If the signs are favourable, I'd be happy to leave darcs 1 behind.

I'd keep it around, just in case!

Cheers,
        Simon

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to