david.waern:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to add Type Families support to the Haddock HTML backend.
> What would be the best way to do it? I'm thinking it could work
> similar to how classes and instances are currently rendered, so that
> type/data/newtype instances are collected and attached to type family
> declarations. Is this too simplistic? Should we render
> type/data/newtype instances as separate entities in the module
> documentation instead (and perhaps do the same thing with class
> instances)?
>
> Currently, when packages export instances that belong to classes from
> other packages, those instances are not documented anywhere. An
> advantage of having instances as separate entities in the exporting
> module documentation is that no instances are "lost".
>
Please go for it! I need type families support for the uvector
documentation to build.
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/uvector/0.1/logs/failure/ghc-6.8
-- Don
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
