Simon Marlow:
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
Pepe,
But no, I did push the patch after all.
Manuel, does validate still fail there ?
Do you have the patch below?

Sun Dec  9 10:21:41 PST 2007  Pepe Iborra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Adapt to changes in :print (contents of references)

 M ./tests/ghc-regress/ghci.debugger/scripts/print028.stdout -2 +3

It's ok now - I probably pulled before you pushed to the test suite.
Todays failure is
 Unexpected failures:
    haddock.Test(normal)

It looks like mainly formatting differences, so I accepted the output.

Meanwhile there are a bunch of test failures on the stable branch, I've fixed some of them, but we're left with

Unexpected failures:
  GADT4(normal)
  GADT5(normal)
  GADT6(normal)
  InstEqContext2(normal)
  gadt21(normal)

should these be marked as expected failures on the 6.8 branch?

I started marking them as such, but there are also some others relate to recent changes in the type checker it seems. I'll take care of those.

Manuel

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to