On 9/27/08, Aleksandr Yakimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> According to FHS/LSB standards this is wrong. >> >> Thirdly, provide a proof-link (; > See http://wiki.eclipse.org/FHS_Compliant_Packages
As I understand, the recent version of FHS is located here: http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html It specifies /lib<qual> and /usr/lib<qual>, but it says nothing about /usr/lib64, only about /lib64. Could you explain this, please? > But I see that Arch developers hate the multilib compliance :) I think that FHS is just a recomendation. No penlties for non-compliance (: -- . Hoc est simplicissimum! ..: maxim.vuets.name _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~cuneiform Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~cuneiform More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
