On 11 October 2010 18:08, Christian Van Brussel <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I think Drupal would be a better choice than
> > Mediawiki, as it is much easier to make it feel like a "normal" site,
> > and not like a slightly mis-used wiki.
>
> There are many reasons to not try to switch to another Content Management
> System, Frank has listed many of them on the mailing list during this last
> year. It's therefore probably better to not switch to something else
> unless really needed. Keeping MediaWiki can seem less easy to manage, but
> I guess that all the problems that may arise while switching to another
> CMS can overtake this.
>
I don't think that switching to something new is a problem if all the
content gets transferred over.
Only Denis and whoever else wants to work on it know whether this is likely
to succeed :)
I agree with Denis that Drupal would be a better choice of CMS.
--
- Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Crystal-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main
Unsubscribe:
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
