It's a reality check. Despite a massive amount of work to make
computer networks secure, remote attacks are often successful (for
many reasons of course, including non-technical ones like poorly
chosen passwords, but technical ones as well), and now we're talking
about securing something the hacker has physical access to. I
seriously doubt any new DRM system will be totally secure in hardware
or software at v5.0, let alone v1.0. So why worry? Some companies
are just banding together to do something they've never been able to
do, definitely won't be able to do well on the first release, and
likely won't be able to do successfully for a long time if ever.
-Jon
At 4:01 PM -0600 1/15/03, Alif The Terrible wrote:
A C-Minus on the Troll-O-Meter...
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Jon Simon wrote:
I'm not worried about DRM. Though I do not at all like the idea of
having someone else 0wn my machine, especially someone like
Microsoft, I have faith that the first several versions will be
relatively easily defeated by wily hacker types. After that, armed
with a machine with DRM but that I 0wn, it doesn't really matter
anymore to me, right?
-Jon Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
