well PAIN is out of some standards organization (as is 3-factor authentication) .... i agree that privacy and confidentiality is sometimes thot of as different .... but others argue that it reduces to the effectively the same requirements ... even tho different people have different connotations with the two terms.
i had fumble fingered 3-4 URLs yesterday .... and the posting to correct them seems to have gotten suspended for some time in the ether .... note however the url for the security taxonomy and glossary had been typed correctly in a posting made earlier in the day ... i.e. http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/secure.htm [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 1/2/2002 7:37 am wrote: Lynn, I think you should specify "confidentiality" as another issue to be addressed. Perhaps you include confidentiality in your "privacy" or "security" subsections, but I've found that many people think (and mean) different things when they use these two terms. For example, is privacy necessarily privacy of communicated data from eavesdroppers, or is it the privacy of personal information (perhaps the privacy of the authentication information) so an eavesdropper does not know who is communicating? Unfortunately your garlic.com URL (security.htm) does not work and returns an HTTP 404 error. -derek --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
