On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) < [email protected]> wrote:
> Shouldn't we first try to improve Internet Standard, and only after look > for custom (and usually not interoperable) implementation? > Well, if you want a forward secrecy for asynchronous communication using existing Internet standards, perhaps you could use DTLS? http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-dtls-srtp-framework-01#page-20 But FWIW, most of the design elements of Nitro come from CurveCP (albeit implemented atop TCP): http://curvecp.org/ Call CurveCP "custom" if you wish, but it's the sort of thing that *should* be an Internet standard ;) -- Tony Arcieri
_______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
