Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Jeremy Utley wrote:
Not Jim's fault if you can't read a changelog entry (which you
conveniently snipped from your reply):
I didn't 'conveniently snip' it. I knew it was there and I did read
it. It says nothing about why glibc (32-bit, I believe) is *removed*
from cross-tools sparc64. This is more than just aesthetic. It affects
the build itself.
--
JH
Where was it removed, it's still there, justing using mutlilib/glibc.xml
instead of sparc64/glibc.xml.
Here's the ticket for the glibc 2.4 changes
http://trac.cross-lfs.org/ticket/12
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-lfs
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
