Dear All,
Here the full publications about CRMdig area and annotation.
Rodriguez-Echavarria, K., Theodoridou, M., Georgis, Ch., Arnold, D.,
Doerr, M., Stork , A., & Peña Serna, S. (2012). Semantically Rich 3D
Documentation for the Preservation of Tangible Heritage
<http://diglib.eg.org/handle/10.2312/VAST.VAST12.041-048>. /VAST12: The
13th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and
Intelligent Cultural Heritage, Brighton, UK, 2012. Proceedings/, (pp.
41-48). Eurographics Association (978-3-905674-39-2), (pdf
<https://publications.ics.forth.gr/_publications/SemanticallyRich3Ddocumentation(VAST2012)-3.pdf>).
https://diglib.eg.org/items/85c4fc96-e3e3-49ec-ad4b-4881b468dcbf
Peña Serna, S., Scopigno, R., Doerr, M., Theodoridou, M., Georgis, Ch.,
Ponchio , F., & Stork , A. (2011). 3D-centered media linking and
semantic enrichment through integrated searching, browsing, viewing and
annotating <http://diglib.eg.org/handle/10.2312/VAST.VAST11.089-096>.
/Proceedings of VAST11: The 12th International Symposium on Virtual
Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage/, Prato, Italy,
October 18-21, 2011. (pdf
<https://publications.ics.forth.gr/_publications/3D-centered_media_linking(VAST2011).pdf>).
https://diglib.eg.org/items/edf622fd-bfe0-4b6c-b07c-715cf3ea0c89
Best,
Martin
On 8/24/2025 9:18 PM, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear All,
Since a long time there has been silence about CRMdig.
D35 Area had extensively been used in applications and is an extended
interpretation of METS Area, i.e., a concept and format to refer to
contiguous parts of digital objects from the outside, i.e., without
changing the object for entering highlights, as a target for annotations.
It is essential for METS - CRM compatibility and working with visual
scientific data, in particular in art conservation.
The problem in practice arose that such areas ("volumes") in 3D
objects and others may appear and be annotated in 2D projections and
vice-versa. This caused ambiguities of identity and reference. The
logic has been published around 2012. Therefore the"propagation"
links. In the original applications, the content model itself was in
another system, therefore missing in CRMdig.
I have complemented the definitions now with the adequate content
model, to make it selfcontained.
All changes are highlighted in yellow.
In the attached, examples are not updated.
I will continue reviewing the annotation model in CRMdig. it needs
updating with CRMinf, may be to be moved there, as has been proposed
in the past.
It is based on a copy from CRMdig 4.0
All the best,
Martin
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Email:[email protected]
Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list
