ciao a.l.e, On March 20, 2011 05:32:59 pm a.l.e wrote: > it's not really practical to put a svn check out on a webserver: it's > polluted with .svn directories...
Bruno wrote the little script for Hugin when it was on SVN. It was a one liner check out + rsync to the actual web space, and the rsync command would filter out the .svn pollution. > we are changing now for drupal. now? with LGM just around the corner? I don't think it is wise to make such deep changes so late in the cycle. Work with what you have now, and decide about those tools for 2012 and beyond. Doing changes *now* in the heat of the deadlines is a recipe for... > i hope we won't have to change again next year! ... not getting it right and having to change again next year! > not sure if it's worth to put a drupal instance in a revision system no, it is not. just backup the database and you're fine. On the other hand, a drupal powered site uses up more resources than a revision-managed static site. Just in case you get slashdotted... Yuv
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
