On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 10:39 +0200, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > Jon Phillips wrote: > > There are a few ways we can figure out which one to go with above. What > > do you all think? > > > > 1.) EASIEST: Let the last 3 organizers of LGM's to make the decision and > > be in complete agreement over the decision for next year. > > I've previously proposed a committee made up of ex-organisers and the > biggest attending projects. That is, a group of 6 with: > Me, Louis, Kamila, and someone from each of the GIMP, Inkscape and > Scribus (probably Sven, don't know who from Inkscape (Bryce maybe?) and > either Peter or Craig).
Sorry, I somehow missed this. Sounds good. I think Bryce or Ted... The (L)G(M)6. > > 2.) EASY: We let the above proposals fill out by the proposers and then > > we can all make comments on the proposals, and decide amongst ourselves > > where to do the next LGM. > > That's probably a precondition, rather than an alternative to be honest :) Yes, true...I meant this as a more freeform decision by those who speak up :) > > How does this sound to all? Is the above too complicated and/or place > > too much strain on this process? I'm hopeful all get a chance to make > > case, and set me straight if I'm off-point on anything in this email. :) > > Gathering comments is great, having a small group which represents the > main stakeholders is good for reaching a finality and getting a decision. > > Cheers, > Dave. Yes, I like idea of the committee of the aboce to review...committee folks, what do you think? And, on the timeline? Jon -- Jon Phillips San Francisco, CA + Guangzhou + Beijing GLOBAL +1.415.830.3884 CHINA +86.1.360.282.8624 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rejon.org IM/skype: kidproto Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
