I completely agree +50 Jon
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 16:22 +0200, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > Louis Desjardins wrote: > > It has to be understood that I am not pulling it towards "me" but as I > > understand it so far from the discussions, it seems that Singapore is a > > long-shot that we should continue to consider... > > Before concluding anything in particular about the Singapore bid, we owe > it to Andy to give him a chance to say what he's organised already, and > what's left to do. > > It's not visible from mailing list traffic, but when I spoke to Andy > during GUADEC this year he shocked me with the amount of advance work > he'd put into it at that stage. I told him as much, and asked him to > mail the list with that info - he was unwilling to do that until he had > what he considered a "solid" bid. > > I guess when the Amsterdam option came along and was generally praised, > he decided to back down from his bid. But now I'd really like to hear > from him so that any decision that gets made is made based on full > knowledge. > > Cheers, > Dave. > > -- Jon Phillips San Francisco, CA + Guangzhou + Beijing GLOBAL +1.415.830.3884 CHINA +86.1.360.282.8624 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rejon.org IM/skype: kidproto Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
