On 24 June 2011 14:40, Dave Anderson <ander...@redhat.com> wrote: > And for that matter, since tty->read_cnt is 0 above, > your original question as to how that code path was taken to > begin with is also valid. >
Surely that implies tty->read_cnt has been modified since it was tested, and hence you're looking at concurrency issues?
-- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
