Re: Pleading the 5th

[Declan McCullagh]

At 04:18 PM 4/12/01 -0400, Sunder wrote:
>Um, yes, this is precisely what I've just said.

No, this is a more accurate retelling of copyright law than what you just 
said. Though you weren't *that* far off.

>The odds of him winning a lawsuit based on a single message posted in
>its entirety is something for lawyers (and bookies? :) to debate.  But
>IMHO it would violate copyright.

It might violate some moral or ethical code someone has, but me quoting an 
entire Choatian post in an article would hardly violate copyright law. You 
should read up on this a little before posting. You wouldn't talk about the 
nuances of encryption algorithms before doing the necessary reading, would you?

-Declan