--
At 08:31 PM 4/3/2001 -0700, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> I said, in essence, that we are doing the anti-privacy crowd's a
> service when we argue among ourselves.
Seth is one of ourselves?
I do not think so.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
5oLH/3PGbvMmZBBZ+BGvZnj+BWTlIvYxmNlnZ13o
4eOQQrVobWRVz2sUxwV/TcYKtRFgbhg8GJuQQUXb2
- Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Declan McCullagh
- Re: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Jim Choate
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Sandy Sandfort
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Jim Choate
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpu... Sandy Sandfort
- Re: CDR: RE: Seth Finkelstein, relu... Jim Choate
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant... Sandy Sandfort
- Re: CDR: RE: Seth Finkelstein, ... dmolnar
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluc... Jim Choate
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cyp... James A. Donald
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk? Tim May
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpu... Jim Choate
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpu... Seth Finkelstein
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cyp... Bill Stewart
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant... James A. Donald
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluc... Matthew Gaylor
- RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant... James A. Donald
- Re: CDR: RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cyp... Declan McCullagh
- RE: CDR: RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant... Sandy Sandfort
- RE: CDR: RE: Seth Finkelstein, relu... Jim Choate
