On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:34:52PM -0500, John Young wrote: > Declan's motion to quash, and the evidence it claims > Declan has about the cypherpunk movement, are perfect John is reading far more into this than exists, and his conspiracy theorizing is working overtime. The "evidence" I have is nothing more than my cypherpunks inbox and notes I may or may not have retained from conversations with Jim Bell, that's all. The language in my motion is standard journalist quash-this-please. -Declan
- Screwing Jim Bell and Cypherpunks John Young
- Re: Screwing Jim Bell and Cypherpunks Greg Newby
- RE: Screwing Jim Bell and Cypherpunks Sandy Sandfort
- RE: Screwing Jim Bell and Cypherpunks John Young
- RE: Screwing Jim Bell and Cypherpunks Matthew Gaylor
- Re: Screwing Jim Bell and Cypherpunks Declan McCullagh
- Re: Screwing Jim Bell and Cypherpun... Jim Choate
- Re: CDR: RE: Screwing Jim Bell and Cyphe... Duncan Frissell
- Re: CDR: RE: Screwing Jim Bell and ... Eric Cordian
- Re: Screwing Jim Bell and Cypherpunks Ken Brown
- Re: Screwing Jim Bell and Cypherpunks Ray Dillinger
- Re: Screwing Jim Bell and Cypherpunks Declan McCullagh
