Sorry, everyone, I fucked up, This was supposed to be a
private message.
we return you now to your regularly scheduled [de]programming.
----------
>From: "Wayne Rad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Hints...
>Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:57:48 -0000
>
>
>YOU're on this list??
>
>wow, small world.
>
>I dunno if you remember I went to your oakland party in 1998,
>(Blanc Weber's idea) Are you still doing those parties? I'd
>forgotten about them...
>
>--Wayne Radinsky aka waynerad
>
>----------
>>From: "Sandy Sandfort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: RE: Hints...
>>Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:48:54 -0800
>>
>>Jim wrote:
>>
>> > Reply publicly to the list or we're done with this discussion.
>>
>>(Take a chill pill Jim.) Sorry all, I guess I pushed the wrong button. I
>>sent the following to Jim alone by mistake:
>>
>>Jim wrote:
>>
>> > Q: When did Congress pass a law specifically
>> > making the 'common law' in the 7th
>> > Amendment equivalent to English Common
>> Law?
>>
>>A: No need, it always was. The pre-existing common law in this country
>>was
>>not extinguished by independence.
>>
>> > Once again, why does "...shall make no
>> > law..." not equate to (common law?)
>> > 'Stop' signs?
>>
>>Once again, the admonition is directed at congress. The common law does
>>not
>>arise out of legislation and, thus, is not affected by the admonition.
>>Quod
>>Erat demonstrandum.
>>
>>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
