Hi Jim,
Can't the node operators set up some sort of filter to catch bounce
messages and prevent them from being sent to the list? It seems logical to
block anything from postmaster@, MAILER-DAEMON, etc...
Just a thought...
Alex
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> Hi Peter
>
> He isn't subscribed through SSZ, no nihilist.com or another.com in the
> bunch. If another alias comes to light please pass it along and I'll
> delete it.
>
> As an aside, I usually only let bounces from SSZ subscribers last about a
> week. If it isn't fixed in that time I figure it isn't going to.
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
>
> Before a larger group can see the virtue of an idea, a
> smaller group must first understand it.
>
> "Stranger Suns"
> George Zebrowski
>
> The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
> Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
> -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Trei, Peter wrote:
>
> > [Apologies in advance for the multiple posting; this had to get
> > to everyone -pt]
> >
> > Jim (and other cypherpunk node operators):
> >
> > The spate of "Mail Delivery Failure" messages we've been
> > seeing for the last few days are due to messages sent to a
> > user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", apparently a very temporary (and
> > now dead) web mail address at www.another.com.
> >
> > I've exchanged mail with the postmaster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
> > and he clearly regards this as Someone Elses Problem, and has no
> > intention of ceasing to send the bounce notices.
> >
> > I strongly advise everyone running a cpunk node to check for, and
> > delete [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's not like he/she/it can't resubscribe if
> > they want to.
> >
> > Sigh.... Yet Another Attack now exists against the cypherpunks
> > S/N ratio.
> >
> > Peter Trei
> >
>
