Dear all, Thank you for your reviews of the document and your input into this Working Group Last Call.
With the publication of -24 I believe there is consensus to proceed with this document's publication. Therefore, I am starting work on the shepherd review and will then send it to the IESG. Best regards, Ivaylo On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 10:38 PM Michael Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > See my comment on this PR > https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-hpke/pull/132#pullrequestreview-3843615116. > I believe that we should solve this by referencing draft-ietf-hpke-hpke > like JOSE HPKE does. A breaking change is neither necessary nor would it > be helpful at this stage of the specification’s development. I’ll also > note that such a change would break the intentional alignment of mechanisms > between COSE HPKE and JOSE HPKE, and so would need to be considered in the > cross-specification/cross-working-group context as well. > > > > Sincerely, > > -- Mike > > > > *From:* Ivaylo Petrov <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, February 23, 2026 12:20 PM > *To:* tirumal reddy <[email protected]> > *Cc:* cose <[email protected]>; Cose Chairs Wg <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [jose] WGLC: draft-ietf-cose-hpke-20 (Ends 2026-02-11) > > > > Dear all, > > > > Thank you all for reviewing the draft and providing your feedback. > > > > As a quick update, I am aware of at least one remaining PR from Laurence > that should be addressed before we proceed with the publication request: > https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-hpke/pull/132. > > > > Best regards, > > Ivaylo > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 5:41 AM tirumal reddy <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have reviewed the COSE HPKE draft and it is ready to progress to the > next stage (other than the pending issue raised by Laurence). > > > Cheers, > > -Tiru > > > > On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 at 01:44, Ivaylo Petrov <ivaylopetrov= > [email protected]> wrote: > > Dear COSE WG members, > > This message starts a WG Last Call (WGLC) for: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-hpke/ > > Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceeding with the > publication of this document by replying to this email keeping > [email protected] > in copy. Please provide rationale for support and explanations or > suggestions > for objections. > > Please note there is a parallel call going on in JOSE working group for > the document: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-hpke-encrypt/ > > Please consider reviewing both documents. > > This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-02-11 > > > Thank you, > > -- Mike > and Ivo > > COSE > co-chairs > > > Please note: > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1]. > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the > provisions > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be > found at [3]. > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
