I support publication On Wed, Jun 4, 2025, 03:19 Brian Krell <briankr= [email protected]> wrote:
> I have re-read the COSE Hash Envelope draft and support it for > publication. This approach enables scenarios in which an intermediate > verifier needs to ensure signature integrity even without access to the > full payload, as can occur with SCITT. > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > > > *From:* Michael Jones <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 3, 2025 10:52 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [COSE] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope-05 > > > > Ivo and looked at the results from the WGLC, and they were underwhelming. > By our count, only three people responded requesting publication, which, by > itself, doesn’t indicate working group consensus. > > > > We’re giving people another week to respond saying that they support (or > don’t support) publication of this working group draft. Please reply-all > to this thread. > > > > Thank you, > > -- Ivo & > Mike > > > > *From:* Michael Jones > *Sent:* Friday, April 4, 2025 1:53 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope-05 > > > > This note starts a two-week Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for the COSE > Hash Envelope specification > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope-05.html. > The WGLC will run for two weeks, ending on Friday, April 18, 2025. > > > > Please review and send any comments or feedback to the working group. > Even if your feedback is “this is ready for publication”, please let us > know. > > > > Thank you, > > -- Mike and Ivaylo, COSE Chairs > > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
