Similar fix for i440x: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41368
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:29 AM Aaron Durbin <[email protected]> wrote: > > i440x chipset is doing things in the wrong way like sandybridge. I uploaded > this fix for sandy: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41364 We'll need > to do the equivalent for i440x. > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:13 AM Aaron Durbin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> OK. I'll take a look at your logs and see what's going on. The patch link I >> sent was based off of someone else's mainboard logs. >> >> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:59 AM Keith Hui <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Aaron, >>> >>> It didn't help. There still a way out of whack entry in the coreboot >>> table and e820 entry ending at 000003ffffffffff, which I think have >>> more to do than the 41363's scope. >>> >>> Keith >>> >>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:24 PM Aaron Durbin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > I think the following patch will fix things up: >>> > https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41363 Please let me know. >>> > >>> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 8:43 AM Keith Hui <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Thanks Furquan. >>> >> >>> >> Here are 3 logs. Log 1 is at the commit just before the problem. Log 2 >>> >> is at the problem commit. Log 3 is at the current master, if that's >>> >> what you meant by ToT. >>> >> >>> >> I'm using SeaBIOS 1.13.0, compiled once using the attached .config >>> >> before taking these logs. All 3 runs are taken using the same SeaBIOS >>> >> binary. >>> >> >>> >> Then I recompiled SeaBIOS with CONFIG_RELOCATE_INIT off, replaced the >>> >> payload used in run 3, and took an extra run. In this case the board >>> >> reset on its own at "Scanning option roms", looping infinitely. >>> >> >>> >> Hope this helps >>> >> Keith >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 7:38 AM Furquan Shaikh >>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > Thanks for the report Keith! >>> >> > >>> >> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 3:42 AM Paul Menzel <[email protected]> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Dear Keith, >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Am 13.05.20 um 05:21 schrieb Keith Hui: >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > I am still refining the P2B family of boards, now including the >>> >> > > > infamous P3B-F with an unusual appetite for hacks to make work. >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > That said, I'm now finding that, on P3B-F, SeaBIOS hangs when it >>> >> > > > tries >>> >> > > > to relocate itself as part of its usual chores. Having just learned >>> >> > > > git bisect, I decided to try it out. >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > It was commit 3b02006afe8a85477dafa1bd149f1f0dba02afc7 [1] that >>> >> > > > broke >>> >> > > > my SeaBIOS. It doesn't affect my newer toy the P8Z77-M as much as >>> >> > > > P3B-F, but I still want to blame that, and probably the very next >>> >> > > > commit as well, as they both deal with some very modern aspects of >>> >> > > > PCI >>> >> > > > that well predates the 440BX. >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > Is there anything we can do to fix 3b02006afe? >>> >> > > >>> >> > > I commented in the change-set [1] to make the author and reviewers >>> >> > > aware >>> >> > > of this issue and referenced your list message, and ask to comment >>> >> > > here. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Could you please provide the debug log of coreboot and SeaBIOS? >>> >> > >>> >> > As Paul mentioned, can you please provide the debug logs for coreboot >>> >> > and SeaBIOS both with ToT coreboot and with HEAD set before the change >>> >> > 3b02006afe where it does not hang? Thanks! >>> >> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > Meanwhile I ported the P3B-F board enable to flashrom [2], which >>> >> > > > got a >>> >> > > > heavy workout during this bisect, through vendor firmware and both >>> >> > > > good and bad builds of coreboot. In all cases I can flash >>> >> > > > internal, no >>> >> > > > longer having to haul out my P2B-LS just to use it as a flasher. >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > Enjoy this long overdue board enable. If it gets submitted, I'll >>> >> > > > retract the ramstage hack[3] doing the same as redundant. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Very nice! It’s always amazing, how after so many years, when the >>> >> > > vendor >>> >> > > already stopped supporting the device, the community still supports >>> >> > > the >>> >> > > device and improves the firmware showing that Free Software is the >>> >> > > more >>> >> > > sustainable way. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Kind regards, >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Paul >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > [1] https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39486 >>> >> > > > [2] https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/41354 >>> >> > > > [3] https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41224 >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > > coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] >>> >> > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] >>> >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
