core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• [jdk25] RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Erik Gahlin
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Markus Grönlund
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Alan Bateman
  • [jdk25] Integrated: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Erik Gahlin
• RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Joe Darcy
• RFR: 8362304: Fix JDWP spec w.r.t. OPAQUE_FRAME and INVALID_SLOT errors Chris Plummer
• [jdk25] RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled Alan Bateman
  • [jdk25] Integrated: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled Brian Burkhalter
• How important is jspawnhelper crash detection? Thomas Stüfe
  • Re: How important is jspawnhelper crash detection? Roger Riggs
  • Re: How important is jspawnhelper crash detection? Thomas Stüfe
  • Re: How important is jspawnhelper crash detection? Thomas Stüfe
• RFR: 8361888: [GCC static analyzer] ProcessImpl_md.c Java_java_lang_ProcessImpl_forkAndExec error: use of uninitialized value '*(ChildStuff *)p.mode Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8361888: [GCC static analyzer] ProcessImpl_md.c Java_java_lang_ProcessImpl_forkAndExec error: use of uninitialized value '*(ChildStuff *)p.mode Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8361888: [GCC static analyzer] ProcessImpl_md.c Java_java_lang_ProcessImpl_forkAndExec error: use of uninitialized value '*(ChildStuff *)p.mode SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8361888: [GCC static analyzer] ProcessImpl_md.c Java_java_lang_ProcessImpl_forkAndExec error: use of uninitialized value '*(ChildStuff *)p.mode Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8361888: [GCC static analyzer] ProcessImpl_md.c Java_java_lang_ProcessImpl_forkAndExec error: use of uninitialized value '*(ChildStuff *)p.mode Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8358530: enhanced Properties#list javadoc cagliostro92
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: enhanced Properties#list javadoc Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: enhanced Properties#list javadoc cagliostro92
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: enhanced Properties#list javadoc Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v2] cagliostro92
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] cagliostro92
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v2] cagliostro92
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] cagliostro92
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] cagliostro92
  • Integrated: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values cagliostro92
• RFR: 8362207: Add more test cases for possible double-rounding in fma Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362207: Add more test cases for possible double-rounding in fma Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8362207: Add more test cases for possible double-rounding in fma SendaoYan
  • Integrated: 8362207: Add more test cases for possible double-rounding in fma Joe Darcy
• RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v3] Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8362169: Pointer passed to upcall may get wrong scope Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8362169: Pointer passed to upcall may get wrong scope Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: 8362169: Pointer passed to upcall may get wrong scope Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8342382: Implementation of JEP G1: Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier [v42] Thomas Schatzl
• RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v5] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v2] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v2] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v2] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v3] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v4] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v5] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v5] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v6] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v6] Xueming Shen
  • Integrated: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char Xueming Shen
• Withdrawn: 8342382: Implementation of JEP G1: Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier duke
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Hans Boehm
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v22] fabioromano1
• Withdrawn: 8352044: Add --with-import-jvms to configure duke
• RFR: 8361224: [macos] MacSignTest.testMultipleCertificates failed Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8361224: [macos] MacSignTest.testMultipleCertificates failed Alexey Semenyuk
  • Integrated: 8361224: [macos] MacSignTest.testMultipleCertificates failed Alexander Matveev
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v21] fabioromano1
• RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Naoto Sato
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v20] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v20] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v20] Hans Boehm
• ClassLoader Leak via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(...) Chris Dennis
  • Re: ClassLoader Leak via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(...) Viktor Klang
  • Re: ClassLoader Leak via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(...) Alan Bateman
  • Re: ClassLoader Leak via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(...) Chris Dennis
  • Re: ClassLoader Leak via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(...) Chris Dennis
  • Re: ClassLoader Leak via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(...) Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v19] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v19] Hans Boehm
• RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8361697: Remove duplicate message in MainResources.properties Pooja-DP
  • Re: RFR: 8361697: Remove duplicate message in MainResources.properties Pooja-DP
  • Re: RFR: 8361697: Remove duplicate message in MainResources.properties Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8361697: Remove duplicate message in MainResources.properties Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8361697: Remove duplicate message in MainResources.properties duke
  • Integrated: 8361697: Remove duplicate message in MainResources.properties Pooja-DP
• RFR: JDK-8289798: Update to use jtreg 8 Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8361533: Apply java.io.Serial annotations in java.logging Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8361533: Apply java.io.Serial annotations in java.logging Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms John Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v4] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v5] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v5] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v5] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v5] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms Chen Liang
• RFR: 8361909: ConstantPoolBuilder::loadableConstantEntry and constantValueEntry should throw NPE Chen Liang

• Earlier messages
• Later messages