On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 10:48:25 GMT, Emanuel Peter <epe...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> > @XiaohongGong Thanks for splitting this one out, and for investigating 
>>> > the regressions here.
>>> > Putting the permalink here, fixed to the current change (the link you 
>>> > pasted will always refer to the newest, which may later on point to the 
>>> > wrong line when lines above are inserted / deleted):
>>> > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/7077535c0b0a6ea0a2a167f9135b1504a3d71fb3/src/hotspot/share/opto/loopnode.cpp#L1659-L1661
>>> > 
>>> > I wonder if we should just use `Node::uncast` there? But I'm quite unsure 
>>> > about that.
>>> 
>>> Sounds good to me. I will have a deep investigation for it. Thanks!
>> 
>> Hi @eme64  @jatin-bhateja,  I'v created a PR 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/25539 to fix this issue. With this 
>> change, the performance regression can be fixed as well.  Could you please 
>> take a look at that change and help to run the test on different X86 
>> machines?   Thanks a lot!
>
> @XiaohongGong I reviewed https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/25539. Since it 
> is a relatively simple patch, I suggest that we integrate that one first, and 
> come back to this here later. Is that ok for you?

Hi @eme64 I'v updated the patch to fix the comment issue you pointed above. 
Could you please help take a look at again? Thanks a lot!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25138#issuecomment-3004029058

Reply via email to