On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 4:51 PM Maurizio Cimadamore < maurizio.cimadam...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding... what would be the difference between > StableValue::supplier and Supplier::cache ? > > Is it a discoverability issue you are pointing out (e.g. this factory > would be more discoverable if it belonged to Supplier -- which is something > we flipped-flopped several times about) or is there more, e.g. a semantics > distinction? > It's me who misunderstood: I misread StableValue::supplier signature and had thought it would return a StableValue. And that is wrong, it does indeed return a Supplier, my bad! So I suspect the issue I faced is more an issue of discoverability or consistency with existing APIs then: if I want a Supplier, the first thing I'd try is to use my IDE to complete Supplier.| , I don't think I would easily think of completng StableValue.| to get a Supplier. > -- Mickael Istria Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/eclipseide> developer, for Red Hat <https://developers.redhat.com/>
