http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|dhcp address assigned even |zeroconf route added even
|though static IP is present |though static IP is present
|(mandrake-9.1rc1/2) |(mandrake-9.1rc1/2)
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 00:25 -------
I am not sure that your bug report is correct, since you only show the routing
table. Can you confirm otherwise that the dhcpclient has been run?
Fred, I think the problem is that the zeroconf route is being addded regardless
of whether a zeroconf ip has been used or not. This also affects dhcp users,
since on a network with a dhcp server (ie not using zeroconf), the route should
not be set (unless you are trying to attempt hotplugging even when ifplugd does
not work?).
So, I have changed the summary to reflect this.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], can you confirm whether my hypothesis here is correct? (ie, if
you have access to the logs on a dhcp server on your network, can you see a
DHCPDISCOVER request coming from this machine?)
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
------- Reminder: -------
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date:
description:
Using mdk-9.1rc1. In drakconnect, a static IP has been assigned and the box
for dhcp is unchecked. In spite of that, "route -en" shows a dhcp related entry:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
As is noticable, the static IP is working just fine. But the dhcp-client is still
trying
to get a dhcp address (in this case it has failed).
