--- On Mon 02/03, Laurent Montel < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Le Monday 03 February 2003 15:39, Jason Straight a �crit : >> Now that I feel mandrake has done the politically correct thing by not It is not the politically correct thing, it is the right thing. >> taking away our choice, I'd like to know more about mdkkdm and what it's >> plans are? Thank you for restoring it. >> What is the whole reason behind mdkkdm? Just branding or is there some goal >> to new added functionality that's being worked on? >There is not new feature. What's the point then? >> In the past I've seen mdk changes that were not liked at first, I remember >> some rpmdrake things that really pissed people off, but mdk came through >> with a very nice rpmdrake. I trust that will happen with mdkkdm as well, >> but I'm glad the choice isn't taken away from us now to use what we want to >> use. In those other instances, there were serious flaws with the program being replaced, eg. rpmdrake >> I think kde's kdm is really nice, couldn't the kdm that's already there >> just have some branding added to it by mdk without redoing the layout and >> functions? > New kdm is a just a redesign of kdm. It's a lot of work to redesign the UI of something that is very nice already. I would be more agreeable to spending time on this if there was a major feature add. Gregory K. Meyer
_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!
