On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 17:44:06 -0400 Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, I'd like to see your spec... email it to me. > I don't really feel like libifying the plugins, even if they do have a > major API number.
Well, I've played around with it some. The result http://www.eslrahc.com/gdam-0.942-1cae.src.rpm This breaks the package into.. gdam-common-0.942-1cae.i586.rpm gdam-server-0.942-1cae.i586.rpm gdam-client-0.942-1cae.i586.rpm gdam-clients-gtk-0.942-1cae.i586.rpm gdam-devel-0.942-1cae.i586.rpm gdam-alsa-plugin-0.942-1cae.i586.rpm gdam-xmms-plugin-0.942-1cae.i586.rpm It still gives rpmlint a long list of things to complain about. >From development file is located in a non-devel package. to non-versioned-file-in-library-package. But with this app I see no way to eliminate these errors. That a look at it if you like. Use all/some/none of it as you wish. Charles -- Fortune's real live weird band names #711: Thurston Howell's Boner ------------------------- Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel-2.4.22-10.tmb.4mdkenterprise http://www.eslrahc.com -------------------------
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
