On Wednesday 01 October 2003 10:04 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
> Felix Miata wrote:
> > jokerman64 wrote:
> >>... anti-aliased. well kinda. read on.
> >>Ok after wgetting http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ and taking a closer
> >> look at it. It quickly became clear that changind a few lines o css
> >> wasn't gonna solve any problems w/ fonts on the site (as i was
> >> previously led to believe). Boo hoo. Well since I've (naively) been
> >> asking/begging/whining for the fonts to be changed i decided to do
> >> something about it. It looked like _someone_ had started changing the
> >> fonts already so i decided to help him along. the whole english site w/
> >> the exception of the docs directory has been mirrored at
> >>http://www.i-kubed.org/en/
> >
> > You can find an (en home only) version legible without need to use zoom,
> > regardless of default font size, resolution, or DPI at:
> > http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/tmp/MandrakeLinux-en.html
>
> Now who's going to volunteer for the tableless CSS version? ;-)
I'll do a tabled css version sometime next week, personally i don't think all
browsers (/me looks evilly at windows browser) support css properly.
Regularly this wouldn't be a problem for me cause I explicity ban people
using IE to access my site (when it was up). But that can't be done here
because we need those people to
1. see this site and
2. like the site enough to stay around so that they can
3. read enough to convince them to take the linux plunge using MDK.
So the site has to readable in the max browsers possible (even the hellspawn
non-standard supporting crappiness that is ie). I guarantee that using pure
css tables will cause problems w/ rendering and fixing them will break
something in another browser and it will just get complicated.
Unfortunately I've also seen pure css site where konqy can't render those
properly but i haven't checked to validate that see to see if that's a
problem.
It was that http://www.csszengarden.com/ using a couple of the user submitted
style sheets.
