Re: [Cooker] kernel 2.6

[Stefan van der Eijk]

Olivier Thauvin wrote:

Le Mercredi 30 Juillet 2003 16:07, Gwenole Beauchesne a �crit :

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:

I saw in 2.4 spec sparc is still blacklist. Are you aware we are trying
to restart cooker on this arch ?
We don't want you make all the works, but please help us !

same applies to alpha, ppc and x86_64

[EMAIL PROTECTED] a]$ cat /proc/cmdline
auto BOOT_IMAGE=2421-6 ro root=305 quiet devfs=mount
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a]$ uname -m

How about... a uname -a?

x86_64
[EMAIL PROTECTED] temp]$ cat /etc/mandrake-release
Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for amd64

What's the problem? Or, are you still telling things without checking?

Gwenole, I don't understand you sometimes...

I'm starting to get used to it... :-/

You know that the kernel don't build on most arch except x86*.

Neither does glibc. I've seen the recent version fail on alpha and x86_64 (turaco at CSC). I'll try on my sparc soon too, but I expect similar results.

Second point, you are running cooker?

Of course he is...

I am surprised ! Where can we get these cooker?

On his machine... where is is being tested (any test reports yet?).

How to access on it? I asked to warly, he don't have it, and don't know if it exist. You didn't notice this on the wiki. Are you aware Jaroslaw Zachwieja give us 3 sparc, 1 alpha and .... 1 bi opteron to make build, test, and package.

Yep... We've got slbd running on turaco (the bi-opteron) churning out packages... They have also been put online at CSC, as there were people interested in it.

BTW: I've had three requests this week from people wanting to install cooker alpha on their boxes.

I just make kernel-2.6 for ppc... I will make it sparc, alpha ASAP, but I will blacklist x86_64 ! No way to check, I won't loose my time.

Olivier, you have access to turaco, don't you? If you need anything else installed to build the kernel, shout.

Please look: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/MdkPorts

If you're working on main, we are interest to build contrib !

brp... why not work _together_ on _both_? Is that so difficult to do?

What we really need is the cooker versions for the archs to continue building, no matter if arch specific development is going on. What happened to ppc is unacceptable, IMHO.

regards,

Stefan

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature