On śro 23. lipca 2003 11:39, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:22:48AM +0100, Jaroslaw Zachwieja wrote: > > On ?ro 23. lipca 2003 03:34, Olivier Thauvin wrote: > > > But lot of things are actually missing in RH: > > > urpmi > > > > Cmon, RH makes money on up2date - they have a real package management > > system, just want you to pay money for it. Apt-get still a pile of > > --force --nodeps poo. > > apt-get is production quality for redhat. But not for Mandrake. > Probably due to errors in the dependencies.
You call broken updates, upgrades, conflicts, unintentional rollbacks and coredumps a "production quality"??? Maybe in RH terms :)))) Anyway, we (CSC) are forced to use RH on some legacy clusters, believe me, apt-get-rpm IS a disaster. -- Jaroslaw Zachwieja Centre for Scientific Computing University of Warwick
