On 17.12.2024 19:48, Aktemur, Tankut Baris wrote: > On Monday, December 16, 2024 8:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 13.12.2024 16:59, Tankut Baris Aktemur wrote: >>> Add 'intelgt' as a basic machine to config.sub. >>> >>> To: <config-patches@gnu.org> >>> To: <binut...@sourceware.org> >>> --- >>> config.sub | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/config.sub b/config.sub >>> index >>> 2c6a07ab3c34eabed8318ec0a37c0cc23b77a63f..63ff958ec125e543674e9b261d5e5bb2fa749c4e >> 100755 >>> --- a/config.sub >>> +++ b/config.sub >>> @@ -1205,6 +1205,7 @@ case $cpu-$vendor in >>> | hppa | hppa1.[01] | hppa2.0 | hppa2.0[nw] | hppa64 \ >>> | hexagon \ >>> | i370 | i*86 | i860 | i960 | ia16 | ia64 \ >>> + | intelgt \ >>> | ip2k | iq2000 \ >>> | k1om \ >>> | kvx \ >>> >> >> Patch 3 enables ld, but I can't spot any gas enabling (sadly the cover letter >> wasn't Cc-ed to the binutils list). > > Sorry, this is my bad. I'll Cc binutils in the next revision submission. > For the time being, the link to the cover letter is > > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2024-December/214029.html > >> Don't you further need to exclude gas from >> attempts of configuring? >> >> I'm also puzzled by that difference: The series supposedly is about enabling >> gdb. Why enable ld there? Just because it's (seemingly) easy? >> >> Jan > > Without enabling ld, when configured as > > <src>/configure --enable-targets="intelgt-elf" > > 'make' gives > > *** ld does not support target intelgt-unknown-elf > *** see ld/configure.tgt for supported targets
Like I think I said for gas, that imo wants dealing with by a top level configure change, adding ld to noconfigtargets for intelgt. Jan
