> On 22 Jun 2018, at 04:17, DJ Delorie <d...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> If by this patch you mean that "riscv-unknown-linux-gnu" means EITHER
> riscv32 (when on a 32-bit os) OR riscv64 (when on a 64-bit os), then I
> would prefer *against* this

The whole discussion is relevant only to cross toolchains intended to generate 
code for embedded devices, where the -march/-mabi is and must be always given 
explicitly, there is no need to guess anything, and the shorter prefix `riscv-` 
reduces confusion.

Native toolchains should probably retain the explicit bitsize in the prefix, as 
they do now.


Regards,

Liviu


_______________________________________________
config-patches mailing list
config-patches@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches

Reply via email to