On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:26:19PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > In this particular case the compiler has already been consulted once with > > if (echo '#ifdef __LP64__'; echo IS_64BIT_ARCH; echo '#endif') | \ > (CCOPTS="" $CC_FOR_BUILD -E - 2>/dev/null) | \ > grep IS_64BIT_ARCH >/dev/null > > to determine that this is not x86_64. Is it a problem to ask it once > more? (And why?)
Alright, I give in. > But in case you *really* want to avoid ever using CC_FOR_BUILD: why > is it even called for Darwin? CC_FOR_BUILD was introduced 15 years ago. There are 11 instances of it that I've been trying to get rid of ever since. Have a look at the lines after the line matching ^set_cc. It's pure horror. Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ config-patches mailing list config-patches@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
