On Friday 20 December 2013 11:40:08 H.J. Lu wrote: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Ben Elliston wrote: > >> There are 12 existing set_cc_for_build usages in config.guess. I > >> don't think it is reasonable to require x32 not to use it without > >> providing an alternative. If you want to remove set_cc_for_build, > >> one extra usage doesn't make it much harder to do. > > > > That's what the person asking for the 12th instance said .. > > > > I don't think it's reasonable for config.guess to depend on a C > > compiler. You would not believe how many problem reports I get due to > > this. > > It has been more than a year passed. I still see 12 instances > of "eval $set_cc_for_build" in config.guess. I don't believe they > will go away. Can we add another one? Here is the patch: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01083.html
it probably doesn't matter, but i agree with H.J. Lu here ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ config-patches mailing list config-patches@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
