[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14219063#comment-14219063
]
Yitong Zhou commented on HADOOP-11211:
--------------------------------------
[~jira.shegalov]: I'm a bit confused. If MAPREDUCE-6128 is not committed, then
why my change in mapred-default.xml is a problem? Both of the two lines are
added by me including the one regarding inner classes (not pulled in from any
branch), I just feel it necessary to also add a comment about inner classes
after I merged my change with it.
Do you actually mean that I should only add comments regarding to my fix in
system classloader, and remove the line about inner classes?
> mapreduce.job.classloader.system.classes property behaves differently when
> the exclusion and inclusion order is different
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-11211
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11211
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: hudson
> Reporter: Yitong Zhou
> Assignee: Yitong Zhou
> Fix For: hudson
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-11211.patch
>
>
> If we want to include package foo.bar.* but exclude all sub packages named
> foo.bar.tar.* in system classes, configuring
> "mapreduce.job.classloader.system.classes=foo.bar.,-foo.bar.tar." won't work.
> foo.bar.tar will still be pulled in. But if we change the order:
> "mapreduce.job.classloader.system.classes=-foo.bar.tar.,foo.bar.", then it
> will work.
> This bug is due to the implementation of ApplicationClassLoaser#isSystemClass
> in hadoop-common, where we simply return the matching result immediately when
> the class name hits the first match (either positive or negative).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
