[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14042006#comment-14042006
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8943:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12652178/hadoop-8943-v3.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common:
org.apache.hadoop.ha.TestZKFailoverController
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/4155//testReport/
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/4155//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Support multiple group mapping providers
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-8943
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8943
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: security
> Reporter: Kai Zheng
> Assignee: Kai Zheng
> Fix For: 2.5.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-8943.patch, HADOOP-8943.patch, HADOOP-8943.patch,
> hadoop-8943-v2.patch, hadoop-8943-v3.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 504h
> Remaining Estimate: 504h
>
> Discussed with Natty about LdapGroupMapping, we need to improve it so that:
> 1. It's possible to do different group mapping for different
> users/principals. For example, AD user should go to LdapGroupMapping service
> for group, but service principals such as hdfs, mapred can still use the
> default one ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping;
> 2. Multiple ADs can be supported to do LdapGroupMapping;
> 3. It's possible to configure what kind of users/principals (regarding
> domain/realm is an option) should use which group mapping service/mechanism.
> 4. It's possible to configure and combine multiple existing mapping providers
> without writing codes implementing new one.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
